Every where in the media we are bombarded by the status of the economy. Are we recovering or how much longer will this down economy continue? As far as I can see the recovery is nowhere to be found. Even with all the government intervention(which prolongs the inevitable) things do not look all that well and here are a few reasons why.
1. Big Banks are Still Hurting
Even after all the bailout money the large banks are in very bad shape. First they were allowed to hide some of their losses with the mark-to-market accounting strategy. This essentially allowed the banks to value all their mortgage assets by what they think is the right price and not what the current market value (which is low) really is. Maybe you heard of a little company called Enron which was famous for using this accounting method.
Secondly the big banks are required to report their debt levels to the public at the end of every quarter. It seems most have been paying back the debt just before quarter end then re-borrowing back to their previous level. Keep this in mind when looking at quarterly results.
market-to-market
banks hide debt
2. Employment Number are not Getting Better
Despite what you have heard the employment numbers are not really getting any better. Their are 1.2 million jobs being created by the government for the 2010 census. These jobs are temporary and are currently filtering into the system. Along with this the FDIC had to hire 1000+ new people to deal with all the new bank failures. These are not the kind of jobs you want to show a strong economy.
FDIC hires
3. New Home Sales
Once again there have been numbers that show an increase in new home sales. This is most likely true but for all the wrong reasons. Just recently the state of California announced it is offering first time home buyers a $10000 tax credit and combined with the $8000 Federal tax credit you may qualify for up to $18000. If I could I would probably buy a house as well. How can the Federal government afford this let alone the state of California. We as tax payers are ultimately on the hook for this debt. Last week I heard Peter Schiff mention that all these credits benefit the hoem seller and not the buyer. If people did not have these large incentives they probably would’nt and could’nt afford a new home which would aeventually cause the prices to fall. This scheme just falsely props up the housing market. The home builders need to stop adding to the inventory which I know is hard cause that’s how they survive.
New home tax credits
4. Cash For Clunkers Will Hurt the Auto Industry in the Long Run
This was another government scheme to help out the hurting auto industry by offering incentives for new vehicle purchases. This did help the auto companies but it has also created a feast now and famine later problem. Now those who were planning on purchasing a new car for full price would have done so and probably won’t be spending any money for several years now. This may cause future auto sales to dry up completely. Oh yeah and the “clunkers” that were traded in were forced to have their engine and drive-train destroyed. Even though this was supposed to help the environment by taking fuel inefficient cars off the market what about all the perfectly fine used cars that were destroyed for no reason. It takes many years to recognize the gains of a new fuel efficient car compared to your old one. Keeping in mind the amount of resources it took to manufacture and transport the new car and disposing of the old one.
cash for clunkers faq
5. Countries No Longer Feel Safe Financing US Debt
The Federal Reserve has been buying up its own treasuries at a furious pace. They were forced to do this when China and Japan slowed their purchases and began selling at a record pace. Now think if you were in debt and issued bonds for people to invest in but nobody wanted them so you decided to buy them yourself. How would this help?
6. Inflation
With he massive increase in the money supply the threat of inflation is looming. We are starting to see this by the increasing price of oil even though demand is down. Many think the price of oil has been rising since it is traded in US dollars in exchanges around the world. Did you know that food and energy even though it is included in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is excluded from the adjusted number which is used by the media and government.
Here is the explanation of why food and energy are not used when considering what CPI Index to announce
Which index is the “Official CPI” reported in the media?
Our broadest and most comprehensive CPI is called the All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the U.S. City Average, 1982-84 = 100.
In addition to the All Items CPI, BLS publishes thousands of other consumer price indexes. One such index is called “All items less food and energy”. Some users of CPI data use this index because food and energy prices are relatively volatile, and these users want to focus on what they perceive to be the “core” or “underlying” rate of inflation.
courtesy of Bureau of Labor Statistics
Hello? Is it just me or does this say the number is volitile (meaning high) so we would rather not include this. Do some research on what the real inflation numbers are.